Boxing world reacts to Tyson-Paul fight rules: Exhibition or professional bout?

The upcoming fight between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul has stirred up quite a debate in the boxing world, with differing opinions on whether it should be considered a professional bout or just an exhibition match. Despite the announcement that the fight has been sanctioned as a professional bout, former heavyweight champion George Foreman remains adamant that it is “purely an exhibition.”

Foreman expressed his views to USA TODAY Sports, stating that the modified rules for the fight, including two-minute rounds and 14-ounce gloves, make it more of a spectacle than a true professional fight. However, not everyone shares Foreman’s perspective. Retired trainer Teddy Atlas believes that labeling the fight as a professional bout is misleading, while former UFC champion Tyron Woodley argues that the designation is irrelevant as the fight will be real regardless.

The modified rules for the Tyson-Paul bout were proposed by the promoter, Holden Boxing LLC, and have sparked mixed reactions from figures in the boxing world. Abel Sanchez, a retired trainer, expressed disappointment in the hype leading up to the fight, while assistant trainer for Tyson, Billy White, emphasized that the rules may not matter once the bell rings.

Retired heavyweight boxer Tony Tucker noted the difference in round length from standard professional fights, while former fighter Larry Holmes placed his bet on Tyson regardless of the rule changes. Promoters Kathy Duva and Lou DiBella weighed in on how the modified rules may impact the fighters’ performances, with Duva highlighting the advantages for both Tyson and Paul.

With tickets set to go on sale in May for the July 20 fight at AT&T Stadium, fans can expect an intriguing matchup between two controversial figures in the boxing world, with the debate over the fight’s classification adding an extra layer of anticipation to the event.