World Athletics’ Decision to Award Prize Money at Paris 2024 Games Criticized by UCI President

World Athletics’ decision to offer prize money at the Paris 2024 Games has sparked controversy among international federations, with the head of cycling’s global governing body, UCI, criticizing the move as going against the Olympic spirit of solidarity.

UCI President David Lappartient expressed his disappointment, stating that the decision was not in line with the values of the Olympics. He emphasized the importance of sharing revenues and providing opportunities for athletes worldwide, rather than concentrating money on top athletes.

The announcement by World Athletics to award $50,000 to gold medallists in Paris was met with mixed reactions. While leading athletes welcomed the news, other international federations raised concerns about the implications of the decision.

Jean-Christophe Rolland, who heads World Rowing, echoed Lappartient’s sentiments, emphasizing the need to consider the impact on all sports at the Olympic Games. He called for a discussion among federations to address the broader implications of the move.

Critics of the decision, including British rowing champion Steve Redgrave, have argued that it creates an unfair advantage for sports that can afford to offer prize money, while disadvantaging those that cannot.

As the debate continues, the issue of prize money at the Olympics raises questions about the balance between rewarding top athletes and supporting the development of sports globally. With the Paris 2024 Games on the horizon, the discussion around this controversial topic is likely to intensify in the coming months.