Controversy Surrounds World Athletics President’s Decision to Award Prize Money to Olympic Gold Medallists

World Athletics president Sebastian Coe’s decision to award prize money to Olympic gold medallists has stirred up controversy among sports federations. Coe’s announcement that track and field gold medallists at the upcoming Paris Games will receive $50,000 has been met with mixed reactions.

While athletes have welcomed the move, bosses of other sports have expressed their displeasure. The Association of Summer Olympic International Federations (ASOIF) criticized the decision, stating that putting a price on an Olympic gold medal undermines the values of Olympism. The head of the International Cycling Union (UCI) also voiced his concerns, emphasizing that the move goes against the Olympic spirit.

One of the main points of contention is the lack of consultation with other federations before the decision was made. ASOIF and other federations were not informed or consulted in advance, leading to frustration among Coe’s fellow federation chiefs.

Despite the backlash, World Athletics defended the decision, stating that it is a way to empower athletes and recognize their contribution to the success of the Olympic Games. Coe, a former Olympic champion himself, emphasized the changing landscape of sports and the need to adapt to new realities.

The move has raised questions about Coe’s intentions, with some speculating that he may be eyeing the IOC presidency in the future. However, critics believe that the decision could backfire, as it has alienated key stakeholders in the Olympic movement.

As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how this decision will impact the future of Olympic sports and the relationship between federations and athletes.