World Aquatics’ Prizemoney Policy Contrasts with World Athletics

World Aquatics has made it clear that they won’t be matching the lucrative prizemoney promised by World Athletics for their athletes. Despite the financial disparity, top swimmers like Ariarne Titmus and Kaylee McKeown remain focused on their love for the sport rather than the potential earnings.

Titmus, who won gold at the Tokyo Olympics in 2018, emphasized that she competes for the passion and pride of representing her country, not for the money. Similarly, McKeown expressed that any financial rewards are just a bonus, as she enjoys what she does and excels at it.

While World Aquatics has chosen to invest in their events rather than increasing prizemoney, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) highlighted their commitment to redistributing income to support athletes and sports organizations globally. However, not all sporting bodies share the same philosophy.

The head of cycling’s governing body criticized World Athletics for prioritizing top athletes over spreading the wealth to a wider pool of competitors. UCI president David Lappartient argued that concentrating money on elite athletes could limit opportunities for athletes worldwide.

As the debate over prizemoney distribution continues, athletes like Titmus and McKeown remain steadfast in their dedication to their sport. While financial rewards are appreciated, their primary motivation lies in the joy of competition and representing their countries on the world stage.