Controversy over World Athletics’ Prize Money Decision for Paris 2024 Olympics

The decision by World Athletics to offer prize money to Olympic champions at the Paris 2024 Games has sparked controversy among international sports federations. The move, which will see gold medallists receive $50,000 each, has been met with criticism from cycling’s global governing body, the UCI.

UCI President David Lappartient expressed his disapproval, stating that the decision goes against the Olympic spirit of solidarity and sharing revenues among athletes worldwide. He emphasized the importance of supporting athletes from all countries, rather than concentrating money on top performers.

The announcement by World Athletics was met with a positive response from leading athletes, who will benefit from the $2.4 million prize pot to be split among the 48 gold medallists in Paris. However, concerns have been raised about the impact of this decision on other sports that may not have the financial means to offer similar rewards to their athletes.

The debate over prize money at the Olympics highlights the ongoing tension between supporting elite athletes and ensuring the sustainability of all sports. While some applaud World Athletics for recognizing the achievements of Olympic champions, others question the fairness and implications of this move on the broader sporting community.

As the countdown to the Paris 2024 Games continues, the discussion around prize money and its impact on the Olympic spirit is likely to intensify. It remains to be seen how international federations will navigate these challenges and uphold the values of unity and inclusivity in the world of sports.